[m-rev.] for review: std_util__arg_name

[Simon Taylor]

On 28-Sep-2001, Michael Day <mikeday at bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> 
> > which appears to be correct. I didn't test it on tuples or ints or other
> > types though. Shall I back out the change?
> 
> When applied to an N tuple it returns an empty list of argument names,
> rather than a list of N nos as you might expect.

That's wrong. Tuples should be indistinguishable from ordinary
discriminated union types.

Simon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------