[m-rev.] diff: fix sub-module build problem
Simon Taylor
stayl at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Thu Nov 15 23:35:32 AEDT 2001
On 15-Nov-2001, Peter Ross <peter.ross at miscrit.be> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 03:53:53AM +1100, Simon Taylor wrote:
> > On 15-Nov-2001, Simon Taylor <stayl at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> > > On 15-Nov-2001, Peter Ross <peter.ross at miscrit.be> wrote:
> > > > compiler/modules.m:
> > > > Add the dependency <module>.date : <module>.date0
> >
> > > Won't this cause the `.int0' file to be built even if there
> > > are no sub-modules?
> >
> > Looking at the nightly test output, it definitely does.
> >
> > > Please back out the change until you fix these problems.
> >
> > Could you also remove the unnecessary `.int0' and `.date0' files
> > from the installation on the machines which started their nightly
> > test run after you committed that change. Those files will hang
> > around forever if you don't remove them.
> >
> I assume you mean the ones in the installed directories. I will do it
> in a couple of days when they will be more obvious from the timestamps
> which ones are older.
Actually, I just noticed that we don't install the `.int0' files,i
so you don't need to do anything.
Simon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post: mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list