[m-rev.] diff: fix sub-module build problem

[Peter Ross]

On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 03:53:53AM +1100, Simon Taylor wrote:
> On 15-Nov-2001, Simon Taylor <stayl at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> > On 15-Nov-2001, Peter Ross <peter.ross at miscrit.be> wrote:
> > > compiler/modules.m:
> > >     Add the dependency <module>.date : <module>.date0
> 
> > Won't this cause the `.int0' file to be built even if there
> > are no sub-modules?
> 
> Looking at the nightly test output, it definitely does.
> 
> > Please back out the change until you fix these problems.
> 
> Could you also remove the unnecessary `.int0' and `.date0' files
> from the installation on the machines which started their nightly
> test run after you committed that change. Those files will hang
> around forever if you don't remove them.
> 
I assume you mean the ones in the installed directories.  I will do it
in a couple of days when they will be more obvious from the timestamps
which ones are older.

Sorry I didn't make the change earlier, but I left for home just after
posting the diff.

Pete
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------