[m-rev.] for review: remove operator table from transition guide

[Simon Taylor]

On 04-Nov-2001, Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> On 03-Nov-2001, Simon Taylor <stayl at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> > 
> > Estimated hours taken: 0.1
> > 
> > doc/transition_guide.texi:
> > 	Remove the copy of the operator table -- there's no
> > 	point having a copy here when there is also a copy
> > 	in the reference manual. The transition guide copy
> > 	was missing some operators (`rem' and `use_module').
> 
> That's OK, but if you're going to remove the copy from the transition
> guide, you should add a pointer to the reference manual.

--- transition_guide.texi	2001/11/04 06:20:33	1.1
+++ transition_guide.texi	2001/11/04 06:23:42
@@ -106,7 +106,9 @@
 Although there are a few differences,
 by and large if a program is accepted by a Prolog system,
 it will be accepted by Mercury.
-There are however a few extra operators defined by the Mercury term parser.
+There are however a few extra operators defined by the Mercury term parser
+(see the ``Builtin Operators'' section of the ``Syntax'' chapter of the
+Mercury Language Reference Manual).
 
 In addition, Mercury implements both existential and universal quantification
 using the syntax
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------