[m-rev.] for review: fix .maxstack output and update IL instruction set
Tyson Dowd
trd at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Tue May 29 23:06:16 AEST 2001
Since this only affects the .NET backend, and probably doesn't need a
review anyway, I'll commit it now and address any comments later.
On 28-May-2001, Tyson Richard DOWD <trd at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It was annoying me that sample code I was generating for the .NET paper
> had hard-coded nasty magic numbers in it...
>
> ===================================================================
>
>
> Estimated hours taken: 2
> Branches: main
>
> Fix the hard-coding of .maxstack directives in the .NET backend.
> We now generate the correct number by traversing the instruction set and
> looking for the maximum stack depth, rather than just assuming 100 will be
> large enough.
>
> compiler/ilds.m:
> Add code to calculate the maximum stack depth.
> Also fix some missing instructions in the instruction set, and
> remove some unused instructions. The instruction set is now
> up-to-date with the documentation at around October 2000.
>
> compiler/il_peephole.m:
> compiler/ilasm.m:
> Handle the changes to the instruction set.
>
> compiler/mlds_to_il.m:
> Calculate maxstack instead of hard-coding it.
--
Tyson Dowd #
# Surreal humour isn't everyone's cup of fur.
trd at cs.mu.oz.au #
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~trd #
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post: mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the reviews
mailing list