[m-rev.] diff: C# interface for .NET backend.

[Tyson Dowd]

> > Well in general it will need the rvals in future, but in this particular
> > backend we don't need them.
> > 
> > It might be arguably more correct to generate the code using input
> > argument rvals instead of generating ldarg.0 ldarg.1 ldarg.2 all the way
> > up to the arity of the signature.
> 
> Yes, definitely.  Otherwise this will cause trouble when we start doing
> MLDS->MLDS optimizations, such as MLDS inlining.

Well in that case, perhaps we should really consider outline_foreign_code
to be another sort of call.

-- 
       Tyson Dowd           # 
                            #  Surreal humour isn't everyone's cup of fur.
     trd at cs.mu.oz.au        # 
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~trd #
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------