[m-rev.] for review: various mlds_to_il fixes

[Fergus Henderson]

On 13-Jul-2001, Peter Ross <peter.ross at miscrit.be> wrote:
> Fergus wrote:
> > I don't see why that is needed.
> > It's an invariant of the MLDS that fields shouldn't have "local" access.
> > Only entities declared in "block" statements should have "local" access.
>
> The ones that have the local access are the variables next_slots_table and
> string_table which are generated in ml_string_switch (or at least they had
> local access when I started work on this change).

Ah, I see.  That is fixed in the change I committed earlier;
mlds_elim_nested.m now correctly updates their access.

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne         |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------