[m-rev.] for review: transparent sub-modules

[Peter Ross]

Peter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 12:34:12AM +1100, Simon Taylor wrote:
> > On 03-Dec-2001, Peter Ross <peter.ross at miscrit.be> wrote:
> > > Peter wrote:
> > > > We currently don't imply that transparent sub-modules always
have to
> > > be
> > > > used.  The change is trivial to do.  I am waiting for someone to
> > > provide
> > > > feedback on the alternative suggestion that I provided.
> > > >
> > > Anyone going to review this change?
> >
> > We don't have agreement on whether it should be allowed yet.
> >
> Assuming that agreement is forthcoming here is the complete change
> with the changes necessary so that all the transparent sub-modules are
> imported with a use_module declaration.
>
No one seemed willing to respond the my email.

It seems that Simon, Tyson and I are in favour of this proposal, while
Fergus doesn't like it.  We seem to be at an impasse with nothing
happening.  How are we going to move this process forward?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-reviews mailing list
post:  mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
administrative address: owner-mercury-reviews at cs.mu.oz.au
unsubscribe: Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: unsubscribe
subscribe:   Address: mercury-reviews-request at cs.mu.oz.au Message: subscribe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------