Hi Zoltan,<div><br></div><div>As far as I'm concerned you may go ahead and delete it.</div><div><br></div><div>Julien.<br><br>On Thursday, October 20, 2016, Zoltan Somogyi <<a href="mailto:zoltan.somogyi@runbox.com">zoltan.somogyi@runbox.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I would like to delete the --no-assume-gmake option.<br>
<br>
The reason is that I am working on the code in the compiler<br>
that generates makefile fragments, and it would be annoying<br>
to update the code paths that are only taken with this option.<br>
<br>
We had a test in <a href="http://configure.in" target="_blank">configure.in</a> (now <a href="http://configure.ac" target="_blank">configure.ac</a>) that aborted<br>
autoconfiguration if the make program detected was not GNU make<br>
since 1995, and some of the code executed for --no-assume-gmake<br>
looks wrong to me anyway. Therefore I am pretty sure that deleting<br>
this option won't break anything that isn't already broken. However,<br>
I may be wrong.<br>
<br>
Any votes, yeah or ney?<br>
<br>
Zoltan.<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
developers mailing list<br>
<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'developers@lists.mercurylang.org')">developers@lists.mercurylang.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.mercurylang.org/listinfo/developers" target="_blank">https://lists.mercurylang.org/<wbr>listinfo/developers</a><br>
</blockquote></div>