[m-dev.] two issues I need your input on about input specialization
Peter Wang
novalazy at gmail.com
Tue Sep 1 16:39:22 AEST 2026
On Tue, 01 Sep 2026 00:13:05 +0200 "Zoltan Somogyi" <zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com> wrote:
> I have no idea whether Simon intended to work on adding calls to actually
> compute the codegen nonlocals, or whether he intended to hand over that
> work to someone else, or what. (Simon's commits later that Feb all involved
> Aditi.) The emails about that commit are not in the m-rev archive,
> since that started in Oct 2000. I also don't know whether the people
> who later worked on structure sharing/reuse knew about the codegen
> nonlocals being fake. Peter, did you?
I don't remember anything about the reuse work.
> The difference between ordinary and codegen nonlocals is definitely
> relevant to any work on structure reuse; no such system will work
> without it. This means that Simon's work on computing codegen nonlocals
> is potentially useful, though its usefulness is somewhat limited
> by the fact that this code couldn't have ever been tested,
> at least on the main trunk. (I don't know of any CVS branches
> for this work, but there may have been some.)
Yes, I seem to recall the original reuse work was done on a branch,
so what we see on the main branch is probably just a stub.
Does anyone happen to have a copy of the old CVS repository?
I thought I had a copy as it would have been used for the git migration,
but it's not on my current machines.
>
> I would be ok with any of 2a/b/c, though I have a slight preference for 2c.
I agree with Julien.
Peter
More information about the developers
mailing list