[m-dev.] a conditional field update operator

[Mark Brown]

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Zoltan Somogyi
<zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com> wrote:
> I would however vote against using ?= as the conditional update operator.
> Its form conveys "condition" well to the reader, but to me, it does NOT
> suggest "update".

I misread it as ?= in the OP :-/

>
>> Example code mentioned above:
>
> Is this preexisting code, or did you write it for this post?

It was preexisting but never used, precisely because it doesn't
completely work for nested fields.

Mark