[m-dev.] for discussion: design issue for new integer types

[Sebastian Godelet]

Hi,

> What are you proposing that a suffix L should stand for? Surely not for "signed integer"?

Oh I think I misunderstood how the suffixes are going to work,
I thought there would be the usual (as in many other programming languages) 1000L and 1.4f and the like. But now if the bitness is always included in the suffix that is of course pointless.

Sorry,

Sebastian