[m-dev.] a question of terminology

[Peter Wang]

On Sat, 16 May 2015 09:47:15 +0200 (CEST), "Zoltan Somogyi" <zoltan.somogyi at runbox.com> wrote:
> 
> I just thought of another alternative: referring to .int, .int2 .int3 and .int0
> files internally as .hdr, .hdr2, .hdr3 and .hdr0, in predicate names
> and variable names. That may be less disruptive than any of the other
> schemes in my previous mail. Opinions?

Declarations section, abbreviated as decl?

Wikipedia suggests another term for header files is "copybooks", which
is actually somewhat suggestive, if a term associated with COBOL is not
a problem ;)

Peter