[m-dev.] a question of terminology
mikeday at yeslogic.com
Sat May 16 17:49:14 AEST 2015
> I just thought of another alternative: referring to .int, .int2 .int3 and .int0
> files internally as .hdr, .hdr2, .hdr3 and .hdr0, in predicate names
> and variable names. That may be less disruptive than any of the other
> schemes in my previous mail. Opinions?
Personally not a fan of bringing "header files" back as a concept, but I
don't have much of a stake in the issue.
Prince: Print with CSS!
More information about the developers