[m-dev.] a question of terminology

[Michael Day]

> I just thought of another alternative: referring to .int, .int2 .int3 and .int0
> files internally as .hdr, .hdr2, .hdr3 and .hdr0, in predicate names
> and variable names. That may be less disruptive than any of the other
> schemes in my previous mail. Opinions?

Personally not a fan of bringing "header files" back as a concept, but I 
don't have much of a stake in the issue.

Michael

-- 
Prince: Print with CSS!
http://www.princexml.com