matt.giuca at gmail.com
Wed Jan 16 20:17:05 AEDT 2013
Also can't have private bug reports, which are important for security
It's a shame, because it is a really nice issue tracker. I like that it
On 16 Jan 2013 12:13, "Paul Bone" <paul at bone.id.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:42:13AM +1100, Peter Wang wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 16:40:10 -0700, Michael Hendricks <michael at ndrix.org>
> > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Paul Bone <paul at bone.id.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > > If we wanted to we could use a static system such as this and use
> github or
> > > > another provider's issue tracker.
> > >
> > >
> > > I recommend using GitHub's issue tracker regardless what's decided
> > > hosting. It's really nice to automatically close issues from a commit
> > > message ("Closes #1234") and have links from the issue tracker back to
> > > relevant commits. As one who dislikes server management, it's also
> nice to
> > > have GitHub take care of that part too :-)
> > Can't attach files. Useless.
> I agree with Peter here.
> If you've a bug and want to submit a small program that exibits the bug.
> shouldn't need to download the entire Mercury repository and work out where
> in tests/ your fix belongs. Or maybe this is what gist is for? Anyway
> be nice if that were obvious from the github interface.
> We should submit a feature request.
> Paul Bone
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the developers