[m-dev.] release version numbers

[Peter Ross]

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Ian MacLarty
<maclarty at csse.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Paul Bone <pbone at csse.unimelb.edu.au> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 11:00:50AM +1100, Ian MacLarty wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Julien and I were discussing removing the "0." from the release
>>> versions, so the next release would be 14 instead of 0.14.  From MC's
>>> point of view it'd help when trying to sell software written in
>>> Mercury, as the 0. versions make it seem like Mercury is "not quite
>>> ready", which in reality is not the case.
>>>
>>> How does the rest of the team feel about this proposal?
>>
>> 14 implies that we've had 14 major changes to the system.  It doesn't sit right
>> with me.
>>
>> 1.0 or similar might be better, but then people will want to know _why_ we've
>> decided to move to 1.0 from 0.13.1  From the outside our decision to move to
>> 1.0 will look arbitrary.
>>
>> Naming releases after a year and possibly month might be more appropriate, it
>> seems to work for the Ubuntu project sans the silly animal names.  (How many
>> isotopes of Mercury are there? (joking)).  I like this scheme since it reflects
>> our intentions of making one release roughly every six months.
>>
>
> That sounds fine to me.
>
I also think that it's a good idea.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-developers mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-developers at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-developers at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-developers-request at csse.unimelb.edu.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------