[m-dev.] implicit purity promises

[Paul Bone]

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:55:58PM +1100, Julien Fischer wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> promise_{pure,semipure,impure}_implicit were always a nasty
> hack (and a bad idea IMO).  Now that their principle user
> (G12) has moved over to use explicitly threaded state, can
> we please get rid of them?
> 

I don't know what they are, so I won't miss them :-)

I don't care if they go or stay, but maintainance and support will
probably be easier without hacky features.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mercurylang.org/archives/developers/attachments/20090218/a9234a3b/attachment.sig>