[m-dev.] Fw: Re: Impurity annotations on clauses

[Ralph Becket]

Julien Fischer, Tuesday, 23 January 2007:
> 
> I don't think we should take && as the sequential conjunction operator.

Well, it's "natural" in the sense that's C uses.

> (It would be more natural as the parallel conjunction operator.)  &> was
> another suggestion - it has the advantage of indicating that there
> is some directionality involved.

It also looks like Perl.  I'd rather have a named operator (`seq_conj'?)
than &>.

-- Ralph
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-developers mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-developers at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-developers at csse.unimelb.edu.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-developers-request at csse.unimelb.edu.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------