[m-dev.] proposed breakup of std_util.m

[Ralph Becket]

Julien Fischer, Thursday, 23 March 2006:
> 
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Ian MacLarty wrote:
> 
> > > That leaves std_util.m with:
> > >
> > >         * the unit type.
> > >         * generic higher-order operations like compose and converse.
> >
> > If this is all that's left then perhaps 'misc' would be a better name
> > than 'std_util' :-)  Perhaps these predicates should also be moved to
> > their own modules?
> 
> I don't like the name 'misc', I prefer 'std_util' (or perhaps even just
> 'util').

I think we should split those parts up into modules `unit' and
`ho_util'.

-- Ralph
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-developers mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-developers-request at cs.mu.oz.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------