[m-dev.] TinyCC - May be worth investigating

[Fergus Henderson]

On 11-Feb-2003, Ralph Becket <rafe at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> Fergus Henderson, Monday, 10 February 2003:
> > 
> > So using tcc it takes a total of 3.81 seconds, as compared with 5.18 for
> > lcc and 9.35 for gcc -O2.  That's a 145% (factor of 2.45) speedup,
> > as opposed to only an 80% speedup with lcc.
> 
> Starting to look very attractive for development.  Just out of interest,
> do we have regular builds of a version of the compiler using the gcc
> backend?

Yes, on hg, in /home/hg/public/mercury-latest/i686-pc-linux-gnu-asm/bin.

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne         |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-developers mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-developers-request at cs.mu.oz.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------