[m-dev.] Uniqueness again
Fergus Henderson
fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Sat Feb 8 01:59:58 AEDT 2003
On 07-Feb-2003, Ralph Becket <rafe at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> Fergus Henderson, Friday, 7 February 2003:
> >
> > I don't think that would be a good idea. There's already a fair amount
> > of code which relies on the existing meaning of "unique", and locating
> > and modifying that code would be an unnecessary burden.
>
> I know you've answered this one before, but I'm afraid I've forgotten
> the answer. Which code depends upon the "uniqueness, all the way down"
> assumption?
Well, for example, store__new_ref.
But the point is just that figuring out which code depends on this
requires a quite deep analysis of the code.
--
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au> | "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne | of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-developers mailing list
Post messages to: mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Subscriptions: mercury-developers-request at cs.mu.oz.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the developers
mailing list