[m-dev.] multi-language definitions

[Tyson Dowd]

On 23-Feb-2002, Zoltan Somogyi <zs at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> On 22-Feb-2002, Holger Krug <hkrug at rationalizer.com> wrote:
> > Is that really necessary ? For a backend for which no definition
> > exists, you could simply produce a function call (method call) in the
> > target language and, if supported by the target language, a function
> > declaration. And print out a *warning* that these functions still have
> > to be implemented in the target language *or* defined within
> > Mercury.
> 
> I am not sure whether this is feasible for the .net back end. Tyson?

It can be done, as long as you have some control over where they
implementations end up (which assembly they are in).

-- 
       Tyson Dowd           # 
                            #  Surreal humour isn't everyone's cup of fur.
     trd at cs.mu.oz.au        # 
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~trd #
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-developers mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-developers-request at cs.mu.oz.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------