[m-dev.] Module qualification of typeclass methods
Fergus Henderson
fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Fri Nov 16 02:53:06 AEDT 2001
On 15-Nov-2001, Peter Ross <peter.ross at miscrit.be> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 01:55:44AM +1100, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> > On 07-Nov-2001, Peter Ross <peter.ross at miscrit.be> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 11:05:52AM +1100, Tyson Dowd wrote:
> > > > I also found it difficult to explain what the requirements are of the
> > > > extensions that are being proposed.
> > > >
> > > > Can you gather together a few of the example interfaces that you are
> > > > generating and finding difficult to use?
> > > >
> > > > And can you then list the problems that are happening with them?
> > >
> > > Here is an example of one way to map the System.Object class to Mercury
> > > (the current way we do it).
> > >
> > > :- module 'System'.
> > >
> > > :- interface.
> > >
> > > :- type 'Object'.
> > > :- pragma foreign_type('Object', il("[mscorlib]System.Object")).
> > >
> > > :- implementation.
> > >
> > > :- module 'System__Object'
> > > :- interface.
> > > :- typeclass 'Object'(T) where [
> > > % Instance method
> > > impure func 'GetHashCode'(T) = int
> > > ].
> > > :- instance 'Object'('System__Object').
> > >
> > > % Static method.
> > > :- impure func 'Equals'('System__Object', 'System__Object') = bool
> > >
> > > :- implementation.
> > >
> > > % ...
> > >
> > > :- end_module.
> > >
> > > :- end_module.
> > >
> > > The only real problem with this approach is that to use the
> > > System.Object class in Mercury you need to import both the System and
> > > System__Object modules. I would like a mechanism which would allow one
> > > to import just the System module and get all the required sub-modules at
> > > the same time.
> >
> > Hmm... IMHO this is not a compelling example.
> > Why not just import both the System and System__Object modules?
> > That doesn't seem like such a terrible burden here.
> >
> > Do you have any more compelling examples?
> >
> The problem is the number of imports that you have to do. If I want to
> use some subset of the System namespace. I must import a module for
> every class that I wish to call a method on.
>
> For example to read a row from a database table, I need the following
> imports.
>
> :- import_module 'System__Data', 'System__Data__SqlConnection',
> 'System__Data__SqlCommand', 'System__Data__SqlDataReader'.
>
> while most other languages would require just a
>
> :- import_module 'System__Data'.
>
> The System.Data namespace contains over 100 different classes. So
> assuming I was doing some complicated database work, I could imagine
> that I would need to do 70 imports just to obtain the desired
> functionality. Quite frankly that seems ludicrous to me.
OK, so suppose we have the `:- include' extension proposed earlier.
Why do we need `:- automatic_include' as well?
What's wrong with
:- import_module 'System__Data__submodules'.
where you have
:- module 'System'.
:- module 'Data'.
:- include_module 'SqlConnection'.
:- include_module 'SqlCommand'.
etc.
:- module submodules.
:- interface.
:- include 'System__Data__SqlConnection'.
:- include 'System__Data__SqlCommand'.
etc.
:- end_module submodules.
:- end_module 'Data'.
:- end_module 'System'.
?
P.S. I have a couple of new suggestions for better names for `:- include':
`:- open_module' and `:- open'. The idea is that you open up the module
and get its contents.
--
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au> | "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne | of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-developers mailing list
Post messages to: mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Subscriptions: mercury-developers-request at cs.mu.oz.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the developers
mailing list