[m-dev.] cc_multi or det ?

[Fergus Henderson]

On 06-Aug-2001, Ralph Becket <rbeck at microsoft.com> wrote:
> > From: Holger Krug [mailto:hkrug at rationalizer.com]
> > Sent: 06 August 2001 16:19
> > 
> > That's fine. Thanks ! Do you go with this, too, Ralph ? We'll
> > have `lex__read is cc_multi' and `lex__promise_only_solution_read is
> > det'.
> 
> I'm still not happy, but if this is the concensus then I'd rather
> the names were lex__read_cc_multi and just lex__read for the det 
> variety.

I oppose that proposal.  The reason will probably become clear once you
complete the "Exercises for the reader" section in my previous email.
But I promise to publish sample answers sometime soon in case anyone
gets stuck ;-)

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne         |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-developers mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-developers-request at cs.mu.oz.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------