[m-dev.] Typeclasses and constructor classes.
Fergus Henderson
fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Wed Sep 20 23:22:35 AEDT 2000
On 20-Sep-2000, David Glen JEFFERY <dgj at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> FYI, there is one situation where you might want an explicit
> annotation, though: a class with no methods. eg.
>
> :- typeclass c(A,B) where [].
Another situation where you want explicit annotations
is when you're using an abstract typeclass:
:- module m.
:- interface.
:- typeclass foo(T).
:- type bar.
:- instance foo(int).
:- instance foo(string).
:- instance foo(bar).
:- func f(T) = string <= foo(T).
:- implementation.
:- typeclass foo(T) where [...].
...
Here the interface does not give any clue as to the kind of `T'.
To make the interface self-contained, in such situations we should
require an explicit kind annotation.
--
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au> | "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger fjh at 128.250.37.3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-developers mailing list
Post messages to: mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Subscriptions: mercury-developers-request at cs.mu.oz.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the developers
mailing list