[m-dev.] for review: clean up MLDS init functions
Ralph Becket
rbeck at microsoft.com
Thu Nov 9 20:44:57 AEDT 2000
>From Fergus Henderson on 09/11/2000 04:16:10
> Hmm, could you be more specific?
>
> Using the pretty-printing library would help us format the output
> to some reasonable number of columns. But I don't think it would
> make much difference to the readability or maintainability of
> mlds_to_c.m itself. (That module is performing a fairly simple
> task, since the MLDS is already pretty close to C, so I think it
> would be fairly readable and maintainable regardless of how we
> do the output.)
In my experience, when doing a lot of formatted output, it's easier
to see what's going on in the code using pprint rather than line
after line of `io__write_XXX'.
> > Or is that taking a sledgehammer to a walnut?
>
> Probably. Anyway last time I looked, the pretty-printing library
> has exponential performance for large outputs. So we'd need to fix
> that problem first.
No, I fixed that ages ago to use bounded lookahead. The first
version was indeed exponential, but now it laughs in the face of large
terms.
Ralph
--
Ralph Becket | MSR Cambridge | rbeck at microsoft.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-developers mailing list
Post messages to: mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Subscriptions: mercury-developers-request at cs.mu.oz.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the developers
mailing list