[m-dev.] preliminary MLDS performance comparisons
Fergus Henderson
fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Fri Nov 24 04:05:22 AEDT 2000
On 23-Nov-2000, Peter Ross <peter.ross at miscrit.be> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 03:45:03AM +1100, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> >
> > There are still a couple of optimizations which are present in the
> > LLDS back-end are still not yet implemented in the MLDS back-end:
> > - lookup switch optimization
> > - reverse tag test optimization for types with two functors
> > However, I don't expect to get big speed-ups for those.
>
> What about middle recursion? I would imagine that this will also avoid
> a lot of the stack overflow problems.
Middle recursion is not yet implemented in the MLDS back-end.
However, even for the LLDS back-end, it only applies in a quite
restrictive set of circumstances. I don't expect that it gives
much of a speedup for the compiler.
--
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au> | "I have always known that the pursuit
| of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-developers mailing list
Post messages to: mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Subscriptions: mercury-developers-request at cs.mu.oz.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the developers
mailing list