[m-dev.] for review: change default stack size
Thomas Conway
conway at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Fri Dec 15 14:59:38 AEDT 2000
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 02:34:26PM EST, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> On 15-Dec-2000, Zoltan Somogyi <zs at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> > On 14-Dec-2000, Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> > > This will also improve performance for programs that
> > > don't use much memory, since currently the conservative
> > > garbage collector scans the whole of the det stack,
> > > including those parts which aren't used.
> >
> > Unless this effect is significant (e.g. gets a speedup of at least two percent
> > on a program), I think the problems it causes are not worth it. 3.5Mb just
> > isn't that much these days.
>
> I get a speedup of roughly 2.5% on nrev.
Lies, damm lies, statistics, and benchmarks.
How much difference does it make on any program that anyone uses?
How hard would it be to allocate a larger stack, mprotect it out
and only tell the collector about it as it gets unprotected and used?
Thomas
--
Thomas Conway Mercurian )O+
<conway at cs.mu.oz.au> Every sword has two edges.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-developers mailing list
Post messages to: mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Subscriptions: mercury-developers-request at cs.mu.oz.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the developers
mailing list