[m-dev.] for review: add type_ctor_reps for user-defined equality

[Fergus Henderson]

On 28-Oct-1999, Zoltan Somogyi <zs at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> 
> However, I think you should treat ENUM_USEREQ conservatively (i.e. call the
> procedure in the type_ctor_info) not just for unifications but also for
> index and comparison operations as well.

Yes, that is absolutely right.

> I did not see any other problems in the diff, but then I did not look too hard.

I had a good look and didn't see any problems other than the ones that
Zoltan mentioned.

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger fjh at 128.250.37.3        |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-developers mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-developers-request at cs.mu.oz.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------