[m-dev.] naming policy for functions in trace/*.c
Erwan Jahier
Erwan.Jahier at irisa.fr
Fri May 21 23:17:35 AEST 1999
| Hi,
|
| What's our naming policy for functions in trace/*.c?
| If the answer is that we don't have one, what should it be?
|
| If I remember correctly, when we initially created the `trace' directory
| and the libmer_trace library, I think I suggested that we should use a
| different prefix than `MR_', because `MR' stood for `Mercury Runtime' and
| was supposed to be used for things that went in the libmer_rt.
| I think Zoltan suggested that we use `MR_trace' as the prefix for
| the stuff in the new library. But that seems to have been inconsistently
| applied:
Well, when we move thoses files from runtime to the new trace directory,
we haven't renamed anything.
| (A) Number of functions starting with `MR_trace'
| (B) Number of functions starting with `MR_'
|
| FILE (A) (B) Ratio
| mercury_trace.c 4 4 100.00%
| mercury_trace_alias.c 6 6 100.00%
| mercury_trace_help.c 7 7 100.00%
| mercury_trace_readline.c 2 2 100.00%
| mercury_trace_internal.c 36 42 85.71%
| mercury_trace_browse.c 4 5 80.00%
| mercury_trace_query.c 3 4 75.00%
| mercury_trace_declarative.c 14 24 58.33%
| mercury_trace_external.c 6 18 33.33%
| mercury_trace_tables.c 0 15 0.00%
| mercury_trace_spy.c 0 5 0.00%
|
| So, any suggestions?
Wouldn't s/MR_/MT_/ and s/MR_trace/MT_/ make more sense ?
--
R1.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-developers mailing list
Post messages to: mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Subscriptions: mercury-developers-request at cs.mu.oz.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the developers
mailing list