[m-dev.] for review: reordering for existential types [1]

[David Glen JEFFERY]

On 23-Jun-1999, Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> > 
> > BTW, it isn't that obvious why a complicated unification would require type
> > infos, so you might like to explain this further somewhere.
> 
> OK.  See the diff below.

That diff looks fine, thanks.


dgj
-- 
David Jeffery (dgj at cs.mu.oz.au) | If your thesis is utterly vacuous
PhD student,                    | Use first-order predicate calculus.
Dept. of Comp. Sci. & Soft. Eng.|     With sufficient formality
The University of Melbourne     |     The sheerist banality
Australia                       | Will be hailed by the critics: "Miraculous!"
                                |     -- Anon.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mercury-developers mailing list
Post messages to:       mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Administrative Queries: owner-mercury-developers at cs.mu.oz.au
Subscriptions:          mercury-developers-request at cs.mu.oz.au
--------------------------------------------------------------------------