[m-dev.] for review: Try to clear up the arity confusion when declaring/defining DCG preds.

[Fergus Henderson]

On 26-Mar-1998, Peter Schachte <pets at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> OWTH.

"Oh What The Hell"? ;-)

> +Note that a predicate defined using DCG notation (@pxref{DCG-rules})
> +will appear to be defined with two fewer arguments than it is declared
> +with.  It will also appear to be called with two fewer arguments when
> +called from predicate defined using DCG notation.  However, when called

s/predicate/predicates/
                     ^

Otherwise that looks great, thanks!

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger fjh at 128.250.37.3        |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.