[m-dev.] For review: Add implementation of reference types (global heap)
Fergus Henderson
fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU
Wed Jun 10 17:11:10 AEST 1998
On 10-Jun-1998, David Glen JEFFERY <dgj at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
>
> Personally, I'm not convinced that we should allow polymorphic equivalence
> types with monomorphic definitions at all. I don't think that the "equivalence"
> makes sense.
Sure it does.
If I write
:- type foo(T) == bar.
then this means that for all types T, the types `foo(T)' and `bar'
are equivalent, which in turn means that
for all types T,
for all expressions X,
well_typed(X, foo(T)) <=> well_typed(X, bar)
where `well_typed(Expr, Type)' means that X is a well-typed expression
with type `Type'.
--
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au> | "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger fjh at 128.250.37.3 | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
More information about the developers
mailing list