[m-dev.] for review: Accurate garbage collection.

[Tyson Dowd]

On 03-Jul-1998, Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> 
> No, it just seems conceptually wrong for deep_copy to take a pointer,
> especially a non-const pointer, if it doesn't actually modify the argument.
> 
> Presumably you could solve this by introducing some additional macros
> for the bits that are different between the different versions of copy()?

You could do that, yes.

I can modify it to be a const pointer, that's fine (and truthful).

-- 
       Tyson Dowd           # "Bill Gates is a white persian cat and a monocle
                            # away from becoming another James Bond villan."
     trd at cs.mu.oz.au        # "No Mr Bond, I expect you to upgrade."
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~trd #                -- Dennis Miller and Terri Branch