[m-dev.] for review: nondet stack dumps.

[Fergus Henderson]

On 06-Apr-1998, Tyson Dowd <trd at stimpy.cs.mu.oz.au> wrote:
> On 06-Apr-1998, Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.OZ.AU> wrote:
> > On 06-Apr-1998, Tyson Dowd <trd at stimpy.cs.mu.oz.au> wrote:
> > > What notation do you think would be best?  
> > > Full words like "deterministic" "erroneous", or contractions like the
> > > tracer uses?  I think full words.
> > 
> > I think the same notation as in the source code,
> > e.g. "det" (not "deterministic") and "erroneous".
> 
> How about I add this feature and more to the next change I have lined
> up for stack dumps -- printing proper predicate names instead of just
> label names.  I'll take out the "det stack" annotations for now.

Fine.

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
PGP: finger fjh at 128.250.37.3        |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.